AS THE writer Janice Galloway tells of her formative years in
Ayrshire, she fixes her large calm eyes on me. I am the one who feels
the tears coming. ''My father, who had a newsagent's shop, was an
alcoholic and died when I was five. I can remember the screaming matches
and being burned by lighted cigarettes as I was picked up. I'm
constantly appalled by the stupid ideas that adults who should know
better have about how permissive the 1960s were.
''My mother left her husband, and she couldn't find anywhere to live.
Eventually we lived in a place above a doctor's surgery. She was given
it rent-free because she cleaned the surgery. We stayed in one room with
a divan that got put down at night. Three of us -- my mother, my sister,
and myself -- slept on the f***ing divan. There wasn't a kitchen; there
wasn't a toilet; there was a potty. My mother used to get 50 pence
widow's allowance. We were living on bugger all. Coming home to find
that the house had to be broken into by your uncle yet again because
your mother has taken another overdose isn't a cheering experience.''
Galloway appears to have had a childhood within a childhood, a
creative cocoon into which she could retreat when the adults began
raising their voices and their hands. She wrote a novel at the age of
11, but it didn't survive.
''My mother burned it. She was superstitious working class, Lorn.
There were things that weren't for you, and something up there was
watching you getting out of line. She used to tell me I'd be found deid
up a close -- strangled with my own tights because I was cheeky to
men.''
She also used to go underneath the table and sing. Her father had left
her with a huge legacy of bad memories, and a couple of hundred pounds
in trust. She persuaded her mother to buy her an old upright piano from
the music shop down the road from the surgery. Primary school had been a
refuge and at Ardrossan Academy she met her musical mentor.
''Ken Heatherington, who died recently, was an exceptional man. He
tested every child and if he thought you were musical you automatically
got violin lessons and got a school violin. The music was like f***ing
Pandora's Box for me; it was the first time I felt there was something
there I wanted to do, and you didn't have to pay money. There were four
school choirs and I joined them all. I tried to get into the boys' choir
as well to sing tenor -- and managed.''
She proceeded to Glasgow University to study English and music. She
recalls that she was advised by Heatherington to take English as well as
music for the intellectual challenge. She doesn't speak with any
affection of her alma mater. ''It was all about exams, and I hated
Glasgow University. I found it quite evasive, quite distant, quite
foreign. It knocked the stuffing out of me, that place. I was also
having to cope with home and having boyfriend problems.''
The girl who had loved school became a teacher. Though she didn't have
a teaching qualification in music she taught children the violin, until
the teachers' strike of 1981 finished that. Why did she become
disillusioned with the classroom? ''You could see incompetent things
going on and being thought good things because they didn't rock the
boat. You could see laziness. It is very easy for teachers to forget
that these are people's weans, and that people want the best for them.''
For most of her life Galloway has been prone to depression. She can
remember when she was about 10 standing on the shore at Saltcoats during
a storm in the winter and wondering -- in fact hoping -- that she would
get swept off. There was an eerie premonition in this experience.
''My mother walked into the sea at Saltcoats when I was in my
twenties. A courting couple found her. She was blue. They wrapped her up
in something like Bacofoil at the police station. She had three massive
heart attacks following it. When she was dying you could see there were
things she realised she wanted to say. Even then she couldn't bring
herself to say them, and I certainly didn't want to hear them.''
It's not surprising that Galloway got into a mess, drinking heavily.
But it wasn't the psychiatric sessions that saved her. Nor was it a
moment of vision. Her life was changed by tripping over a book. ''It was
Alasdair Gray's Lanark. I picked it up and it blew my mind, partly
because I was taking anti-depressants, partly because I was reading it
when I was half cut. I couldn't sleep, and it's a bloody good book for
an insomniac.
''It was the first time I had read a man who was aware that he was a
man. He wasn't the universe, he wasn't the truth, he wasn't harmony,
beauty, love, and deep thought. He was just a man and he was being
sexually honest. That was the thing that most profoundly impressed me.
''And he was being wildly imaginative and having fun and being
Scottish simultaneously. He was using his own syntax, and it was
remarkably like my syntax. And it was weird. It dislocated, and my head
had always dislocated. Suddenly I thought: I can do that.''
Then Galloway had a dream. She found a face buried in the ground and
picked the earth off it. It turned into a man, her uncle George. It
became a short story called It Was, and it was rewritten many times. She
used to hang about the Third Eye Centre, and saw an advert for a
short-story competition with a #25 prize.
''I was badly skint. I needed a lot of dough. I was buying booze
before food. James Kelman was the judge. I'd never met him before, but
when you meet Jim, you really know you've been met by somebody. He said:
'Send that story to the Edinburgh Review'. They gave me #40, so I was
very pleased I hadn't won the competition.''
Learning the craft of fiction, she found that the writing came
smoothly because she was willing to take ''enormous risks''. Her first
novel, The Trick is to Keep Breathing (1990) won the MIND/Allen Lane
Book of the Year. Blood (1992) was a collection of stories. Her new
novel, foreign parts (Cape, #14.99), gives two women on a driving
holiday in France a memorable role in modern literature.
The critic Douglas Gifford, who teaches Scottish literature at Glasgow
University, has said that ''Galloway's is the outstanding new voice
among outstanding new ways of looking at women in modern Scotland,'' and
James Kelman has called here ''a really fine writer''.
But Galloway is too honest a person not to admit that praise has
changed her approach to writing. ''I've always been very keen on pats on
the head, possibly because there weren't very many at home. Once you
start being reviewed you would have to be an exceptional person not to
become more self-conscious. The idea that people had gone into a shop,
paid money for your book and taken it home was like a sexual thing.
People were at home doing private things with your book. And some of
them were writing about it in the papers. I got a huge rush of energy
from it because it meant finally that I did exist.''
Like Kelman, Grey, and Owens, Galloway is published from London. Some
critics appear to see them as a Glasgow working-class writing school, a
literary clique in the same way that Edinburgh's Rose Street poets were
regarded as a literary clique. Galloway gets angry at such comparisons.
''Who the hell lumps London writers together because they live in
London?'' But isn't there a tendency among Scottish critics to do this
with her and her west of Scotland contemporaries? ''Laziness. We have a
bloody lazy critical tradition in this country. These are very limited
perceptions, perceptions which avoid having to read and critically
appraise writers for what they have to say as individuals. Nobody, for
example, would lump Graham Greene and Allan Massie together, but one
might as well say that they're writing about middle-class preoccupations
which are English.''
There is also said to be a political message in the work of Galloway
and her contemporaries. ''I'm a feminist, so the personal is political.
I can't write through me without it being political, because who I am
has been formed in certain political ways. For me, for example, to write
as a woman is a political act in itself.
''For a woman writer to exist at all in some ways and be honest about
the fact that she's a woman and she sees the world in a slightly
different way to men is a political act in itself. To write about female
sexuality is a massively political act. For centuries female sexuality
has been literally unspeakable. Language is by and large a male
construct. Look at the way we use words; look at the kind of words we
have for sex. There are far more words for the male experience than for
the female experience.''
Janice Galloway has a son, James Alexander, to the pianist Graeme
McNaught. ''I'm a kind of a single parent. I tend to think of my wee boy
as having two good female parents. I've lived with my friend Alison for
a long time now. I was staying with Alison when I met Graham. She's a
very generous soul.'' She's reading my face. ''Lorn, this is an official
scoop. Me and Alison don't have sex, never have had, and are never
likely to. We just don't fancy each other.''
Her son has a much more stable childhood than she ever had, but there
are moments when a genetic inheritance seems to be at work.
''Sometimes I hear my mother coming out of my mouth. You catch it, you
say: I didn't actually mean that, son, what I meant was . . . There are
other ways to parent; people used to assume that you brought your weans
up the way your parents brought their weans up.''
Hearing the story of her upbringing, people say to her: it's all
experience; you'll be able to write about it. She responds: ''I've
written a lot of it out myself. There's also a danger of clinging to it
or over- romanticising it, or using it as a kind of passport to being
abusive to people who haven't had that kind of background. You think the
world owes you something. I've not quite placed it for myself yet, about
what it was meant to me.
''But people's everyday lives are utterly fascinating. You don't have
to have all sorts of hellish things attached to your life in order to
have material to write about.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article