Around 1000 Glasgow council workers are in line to receive thousands of pounds in equal-pay catch-up payments at the end of June.
Offers will be made in the middle of next month in line with a mechanism agreed between the city council and lawyer Stefan Cross, whose Action4Equality organisation has pursued their cases on a no-win no-fee basis.
He said the workers, mainly school dinner ladies, home helps and nursery workers, would get payments ranging from a few thousand pounds to £15,000.
A council spokesman said they had agreed a framework for calculating payments, but it was impossible at this stage to say what the settlement would cost. The deal is the latest step in a saga that has left local authorities struggling to meet back-dated settlements running into hundreds of millions of pounds after the full extent of pay inequality suffered by women came to light.
Glasgow has brought in a pay restructuring deal to cope with the payments, but a trail of grievances has been left with some workers complaining that their wages would be levelled down to reduce the gap.
Cuts in services are threatened and unions have been accused of soft- pedalling claims through fear of job losses.
Women have complained about being subjected to time-share selling techniques used at council road shows to pressure them into accepting offers less than they thought they were due, and lawyers like Mr Cross have stepped in to encourage them to pursue claims at industrial tribunals.
A previous offer led to accusations that the women were being pressured into accepting less than they were owed so they could have the money for Christmas.
Mr Cross says that has been improved.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article