A dispute that could have led to rubbish mounting on the streets of Glasgow is off after unions voted to accept a last ditch offer from the city council.
The Herald understands there was a normal majority among GMB and Unite membership to accept the deal, which will see them getting 10 weeks during the year when the four days on, four days off rota will not apply.
The deal will also see the establishment of a working group to monitor the implementation of the new regime.
Although the unions will not receive the offer of stand-by payments as had previously been on the table, their leadership claimed that a work-life balance was more important.
It is also understood that while the GMB and Unite unions accepted the offer Unison, which has the smallest number of members in the dispute, rejected it.
The resolution comes as Edinburgh City Council confirmed that Unite has now officially served notice of its official industrial action, which will be "short of a strike", in the ongoing row over council plans to change pay structures, which could lead to wages being cut.
It is expected that the level of disruption will be similar to that of the unofficial action, which has now been going on for six weeks.
Resolution of the Glasgow dispute follows talks on Friday between unions and council officials, when the action planned to begin on Monday passed was postponed to allow workers to vote on the offer tabled at the meeting.
Last night, Martin Doran, of GMB, said his members would "continue to provide the citizens of Glasgow with a Rolls-Royce service".
He said: "We've balloted three sections of the workforce and they've decided to accept. Most of our members were more concerned about work-life balance and the offer on the table was the best under the circumstances.
"It was close run ballot but there was enough to carry it."
Councillor James McNally said: "I'm very pleased that we have been able to agree a positive deal with our workforce that will allow us to implement four-on, four-off working from Monday."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article