DAVID Cameron is to discuss the possibility of tightening regulations on the internet with international leaders in the wake of the Ryan Giggs super-injunction row.
The issue is on the agenda at the G8 summit in Deauville in northern France this week as the political fallout from the outing of the Manchester United star as the footballer who has a gagging order continues.
Deputy Prime Minister and LibDem leader Nick Clegg criticised one of his own MPs for using parliamentary privilege to reveal the name, warning that no-one was above “the rule of law”.
A leading lawyer, Geoffrey Robertson, QC, also called on Parliament to investigate the MP, John Hemming, amid claims that he abused the rules.
However, Mr Hemming defended himself, saying that the player’s name was already in the public domain even before he said it in the House of Commons on Monday.
Giggs was named just 24 hours after the Sunday Herald revealed his identity to readers in Scotland but not England. He had been the subject of a mass protest over the weekend on Twitter, after it emerged that he was suing the micro-blogging website.
Twitter itself has faced accusations that it was making a mockery of the law after tens of thousands of people apparently breached the court order preventing the identification of Giggs.
The Government has ordered a rush review of the law surrounding super-injunctions, which the Prime Minister has described as “unsustainable”.
A number of peers have called for the review to consider the potential to control social networking websites, as well as the battle between privacy and free speech.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy, meanwhile, has pressed for the laws surrounding the web to be included on the G8 agenda. He is pushing for tighter regulations, insisting that it would be wrong for governments not to get involved in the technology.
A number of delegates from internet companies will attend the summit to take part in the session with global leaders.
However, it is thought that Twitter will not be among them, despite being one of the most high-profile web firms in the world.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman did not rule out that Giggs and the current row over the role of the internet in breaking court orders could come up at the meeting, describing the discussion as “free flowing”.
However, it is not thought that any firm decisions on regulation will be made at the summit.
Mr Hemming told MPs yesterday that questions had been raised about whether he should have named the player.
In a staunch defence of his actions, he said: “I’m not a party to the privacy case, I’m not being served with the injunctions, I haven’t actually seen the injunctions and cannot guarantee that it actually exists.
“I’ve read his name in the Sunday Herald, I’ve read his name in Wikipedia, I’ve read his name on Twitter. I can honestly stand on a soap box and say what I said in the House of Commons in Scotland.
“I believe I could probably say it on Hyde Park Corner because it is in the public domain.
“For me to have abused parliamentary privilege I would have to use it in the first instance.
“I do not think the case has been made that in fact it would have been contempt of court outside this House.”
Even before Mr Hemming rose to speak, Deputy Speaker Lindsay Hoyle said he had been asked by Speaker John Bercow to remind him of the ruling given by him yesterday “in which he strongly deprecated the abuse of parliamentary privilege to flout an order or score a particular point”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article