AIRLINES have branded a consultation on air passenger duty a "sham" after the UK Government ruled out a reduction in the controversial tax and resisted calls to devolve responsibility for it to Scotland.
The Treasury said an 8% increase in APD, which is paid by passengers on all flights departing from UK airports, would go ahead in January due to pressure on the public finances, despite claims from business leaders that it is damaging tourism and costing jobs.
Despite initially pledging to devolve the tax as part of the Scotland Bill, a formal Treasury response to the consultation yesterday said merely that it would "continue to explore the feasibility and likely effects of devolution of APD to Scotland and Wales".
However, legislation to devolve APD to Northern Ireland will be introduced following an emergency cut to the tax on long-haul flights in September, the Treasury confirmed.
The decision was attacked by a broad coalition of airports, airlines, business groups and tourism bodies yesterday.
In a statement, the bosses of easyJet, Ryanair, Virgin Atlantic and British Airways parent company IAG, said: "The Government's consultation on APD has been a sham and a waste of taxpayers' money."
Amanda McMillan, managing director of Glasgow Airport, said it was "deeply concerning" that the UK Government planned to forge ahead with it's planned increase in APD.
"UK aviation tax rates are the highest of any major European country and APD is already proving a significant barrier to attracting new routes," she said.
A Treasury spokesman said: "The Government has been consistent that the aviation sector must play its part in reducing the deficit and restoring the public finances."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article