SCOTLAND'S "ned culture" cost businesses £740 million last year, according to insurance company More Than.
Nearly 50% of firms in Scotland were affected by criminality including theft, broken doors, smashed windows, graffiti, littering and intimidation.
Or, to put it another way, neds were responsible for a £740m boost to various sectors of Scottish industry, particularly the recession-hit building trade. Security firms also benefited. As did insurance companies including More Than which, as you know, is owned by American actor More Than Freeman.
The survey does not take account of the economic contribution made by neds through spending on Burberry caps, white socks, Diamond White cider, Buckfast, Rizla papers and baby buggies for impregnated girlfriends called Senga.
I am not convinced that all the £740m damage is caused by neds. It may be down to old-age pensioners with time on their hands. A bit of vandalism here, some paint-spraying there, and a quick getaway using the bus pass.
The culprits may be company directors. Asked to explain a £multi-million hole in the firm's accounts, they say it was a ned who done it and ran away.
Neds used to be a generic term for ne'er-do-wells, used by Bill Knox on Scottish TV's Crimedesk. (Ask Grandpa to explain, if he's not too busy out doing graffiti.)
Now Ned-ism is a proper culture with its own language. Terms such as bawbag have passed into mainstream usage. The written form of Nedspeak is mainly to be found on subway walls and tenement halls.
The Ned way of life presumably qualifies for protection under Unesco heritage protocols and the European Court of Human Rights. The insurance company better have its facts right.
As this article went to press, More Than Freeman was unavailable for comment. Which is a shame because he has a lovely voice.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article