health board tactics to achieve waiting list results may be far more widespread than previously claimed, it has been suggested.
NHS Lothian stood condemned last week for offering patients unrealistic appointments for procedures in England and using refusal to bump patients to the back of the queue.
Two senior officials have been disciplined following a report by outside consultants and Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon was forced to apologise to the Scottish Parliament.
But Labour now says fresh evidence that numerous health boards had been warned about their use of waiting lists adds "considerable weight" to calls for a Scotland-wide probe into a hidden waiting list scandal.
Citing a spokesman for the Information Services Division who said several health boards had been warned about "high levels of social unavailability", Labour said there has been an unexplained increase in this by 200% in recent years.
It means either people are taking more and longer holidays or finding other reasons to turn down appointments, or boards are deliberately offering less suitable choices.
Shadow Health Secretary Jackie Baillie said: "Scottish Labour has been warning Nicola Sturgeon about this since 2008, and now it would seem we were not the only ones. Warnings seem to have fallen on deaf ears time and time again."
Labour has also called for urgent action to improve treatment for chronic pain patients after a study revealed almost 2000 patients are stuck on waiting lists for treatment.
Findings from Freedom of Information requests revealed that across Scotland more than 1866 patients were awaiting their first appointment, while 1000 were awaiting their second.
The longest wait was Shetland (33 weeks), followed by Grampian (30) and Lothian (22).
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said last night: "Across Scotland, the clear majority of patients are treated within waiting time targets and waiting times are overall the shortest they have ever been."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article