THE Blue Knights' bid to take over Rangers was thrown into doubt last night.
Former Ibrox director Paul Murray's group announced it was stepping back from the proposed takeover of the crisis-hit club after it emerged consortium partner Ticketus was attempting to strike a deal with a rival from Singapore.
It appears to put the offer, fronted by businessman Bill Ng, in pole position to become the preferred bidder for the stricken club later this week.
However, the deal they are believed to be brokering with Ticketus was described by one Blue Knights source as "not in the best long-term interests of the club".
It is understood that the third bidder, American Bill Miller, is almost out of contention.
But there is deep anger within the Blue Knights at the tactics deployed by London-based Ticketus, which originally aligned itself as part of the consortium comprising Paul Murray and three supporters groups.
The Blue Knights said they had been asked by Duff & Phelps to reconfirm its best and final offer on Thursday, believing that the following day this would lead them to being named preferred bidders.
The administrators requested the group provide a non-refundable deposit as part of the process. Ticketus decided it did not wish to provide it, said the Blue Knights.
In a statement, the consortium said it was made aware over the weekend that "Ticketus had been in discussions with the Singaporean consortium who, on Friday, had offered Ticketus a substantially better deal to the one offered by us. We confirmed that we were not prepared to increase our offer to Ticketus".
The statement added: "The consortium believes that the whole deal process has now become incredibly complex and it is critical that a preferred bidder is appointed this week.
"As a consequence, in the best interests of the club, the consortium has decided to take a step back to enable Duff & Phelps, Ticketus and the Singaporeans to conclude a deal as quickly as possible.
"We stand ready to complete our offer of April 4 which included a deal in principle with Ticketus."
The Blue Knights reiterated that their deal, with Ticketus on board, "represents the best opportunity" for Rangers to exit administration via a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA).
The decision to involve Ticketus as a Blue Knights partner had strengthened the bid led by Mr Murray. It removed Ticketus, and the £27 million it is owed as part of a four-year season ticket deal struck by owner Craig Whyte, from the list of creditors in a CVA.
The Blue Knights had agreed to pay Ticketus back £10m of its £27m over nine years. It is believed the Singapore consortium has agreed to pay the firm back £14m over a shorter period.
David Whitehouse, joint administrator, said: "It is disappointing the Blue Knights are withdrawing at this stage, particularly in the view of the fact that last week it was made clear to them and Ticketus that their indicative bid placed them in a strong position.
"We were therefore surprised that their offer to pay an exclusivity fee was withdrawn."
He added: "Ticketus has also been in parallel discussion with one of the other bidders over the last few weeks and it remains to be seen whether these discussions will be taken forward."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article