One in five professionals working with children comes into contact with a new case of neglect every week.
New research by Action for Children in Scotland as part of a UK-wide review of child neglect conducted by the University of Stirling, spoke to social workers, teachers, health workers and nursery staff north of the Border.
The results showed 83% of professionals in Scotland have come into contact with a child they believe is suffering from neglect, while 19% said they came across individual cases of suspected child neglect on a weekly basis.
Alarmingly, 43% of professionals in Scotland said they felt powerless to help, with many saying a lack of services or shortage of resources would prevent them acting.
Neglect or a lack of parental care now accounts for part or all of the reasons for 86% of all referrals to the children's hearing system.
However, Action for Children Scotland says many professionals are still uncertain as to when parental failings tip over into outright neglect, and how to intervene when they do.
While high-profile cases such as that of Baby P, and the death of Declan Hainey in Paisley, have caused outrage over the authorities' failure to intervene in cases of neglect, in reality few cases are as clear-cut, and definitions of neglect can vary.
More than one in 10 professionals (11%) claimed they had been given insufficient training on how to deal with neglect cases. In addition, one-third of Scots said they had been worried about the welfare of a child they knew, with 42% of that group not sharing their concerns.
Paul Carberry, director of Action for Children in Scotland, said: "Our research revealed that both professionals and members of the public are unsure about what to do in cases of suspected child neglect.
"It is more prevalent than physical and sexual abuse – accounting for 44% of all child protection registrations in Scotland – but can be difficult to spot and respond to."
The findings are published as leading child protection experts meet in Edinburgh today.
A panel including former Bishop of Edinburgh Richard Holloway, broadcaster Lesley Riddoch, and early years champion and former Scottish health minister Susan Deacon, will lead an independent inquiry entitled What Makes Happy, Healthy Children? convened by Action for Children.
Mr Holloway said: "We know that many children in Scotland are not getting the best start in life.
"In a relatively wealthy country we have children whose lives are marked by poor health, poor nutrition, lack of nurture and care. This panel was convened to look at why that might be and, more importantly, what might be done."
Action for Children runs a series of programmes designed to improve responsible parenting and the quality of young lives.
Emily Black, of Aberdeen, is one mother whose family has benefited from such support. She almost lost her daughter Teagan and believes both she and her baby son Clinton would be in care if social workers and the charity had not intervened.
A mother at 17, she turned her own mother's tenancy into a party flat, inviting friends round for nightly drinking sessions and living in squalor. The scenario repeated itself when Ms Black moved into a home of her own.
She said: "I always made sure [Teagan] had the best of everything, like clothes and trainers. But she was neglected emotionally, though I would never have admitted that at the time.
"I got in with the wrong crowd and people who I thought were my friends would say 'you've got to have a life as well'.
"I couldn't see any impact. But sometimes when I took her home from nursery, because of the chaos, she would say 'no, I want to stay here'."
Now 22, Ms Black says she's changed her priorities with the help of Action for Children, who gave her supervised accommodation. She was monitored and helped with learning to cook and ensuring she could provide routines for Teagan, now five, and nine-month-old Clinton.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article