SCOTTISH teachers have attacked the controversial classroom practice of streaming pupils on the basis of their academic ability arguing it exacerbates social inequality.
Delegates at the annual general meeting of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) in Dundee yesterday criticised so-called "setting" and called for a move to mixed-ability classes.
Anne McCrae, from the union's Edinburgh local association, said the EIS should challenge the assumption that children should be "stuck forever and ever" in groups based on prior attainment.
Susan Smith, from the Aberdeenshire branch, said: "Research shows that learning in mixed-ability classes can benefit able children and those that need extra support."
However, Ronald Mathieson, a maths teacher from the North Lanarkshire local association, argued that there were some school subjects where setting would have to exist.
"In maths, pupils quickly develop a vocabulary which can be alien to others who would be lost from the very start. There is no point teaching calculus to someone who cannot count," he said.
Kenn Bryce-Stafford, from the Edinburgh branch, said setting would not be necessary if class sizes were smaller, but it was currently the only way of giving greater opportunity to pupils.
"A lot of arguments are to do with social development and we know part of our job is to do with society, but I feel our prime objective should be standing up for education."
The motion to reject setting and investigate alternatives was passed with a large majority.
Later, delegates backed calls for industrial action to fight any future changes to their terms and conditions.
There is concern that negotiations with councils and the Scottish Government could lead to longer working hours and fewer holidays.
The motion, from the Renfrew-shire local association, states: "That this AGM oppose any changes to conditions of service made without agreement and instruct council to organise an immediate ballot for action up to and including strike action in reaction to any imposed alterations to teachers' conditions of service."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article