BABIES should have obesity checks from birth if Scotland is to make inroads into one of the country's biggest health problems, an expert has claimed.
A child health expert says the speed at which a baby gains weight in its first few months can determine whether it is at risk of obesity in later life.
Tam Fry, chairman of the Child Growth Foundation, said the crucial years to check for signs a child could be at risk was when they are aged between one and four.
He said health visitors have a major role to play in the prevention of childhood obesity and has called for greater investment in primary care staff.
Mr Fry added that babies should be regularly weighed and measured against growth before they reach their first birthday but most are not because of time constraints on health visitors and fewer staff.
Scotland has one of the highest levels of child obesity in the Western world, with 22% of six-year-olds classed "overweight".
Mr Fry, spokesman for the National Obesity Forum, says Scotland is dealing with two epidemics, childhood obesity and maternal obesity, and says women should ideally aim to be a healthy weight before they conceive.
He has also called for high school pupils to be given lessons in parenting, including healthy eating classes.
Mr Fry said: "The most important year in a child's life is the first and it is the speed at which they put on weight that is a harbinger for the future. You can't just measure them at the end of the first year. Until Scotland has a surveillance system that will spot the early signs of unhealthy weight gain in pre-school then, in the opinion of the Child Growth Foundation and UK National Obesity Forum, it will never make inroads into one of its major health problems."
A spokeswoman for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said health visitors already contributed to tackling obesity in children by identifying families who would benefit from weight management support.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article