BUSINESSMAN Nat Fraser has suffered a blow in a bid to clear his name over the murder of his wife Arlene after a judge said an appeal would be a waste of time.
Appeal court judge Lady Dorrian dismissed his efforts after reading legal papers submitted by his legal team to the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh.
Fraser, 53, is serving a minimum of 17 years in prison after being convicted, for a second time, in May this year of murdering Arlene, 33, whose body has never been found.
His legal team is claiming the former fruit and vegetable salesman, who hired a hitman for the murder more than 14 years ago, suffered a miscarriage of justice. The grounds for this claim have not been revealed.
Lady Dorrian's ruling followed a process known as sifting, which weeds out appeals that are unlikely to succeed, avoiding the need for a costly full hearing in the courts.
Fraser, from Elgin, Moray, can now ask three judges to review Lady Dorrian's decision.
During Fraser's recent trial at the High Court in Edinburgh, judge Lord Bracadale made two decisions which could be open to challenge.
A witness revealed Fraser had been in prison before the disappearance of wife Arlene, who went missing from her Elgin home in April 1998.
And an investigation was ordered after complaints that a member of the jury had supposedly betrayed a bias against Fraser at an early stage.
In both cases Lord Bracadale ruled the trial should continue.
After more than five weeks of evidence and speeches a jury decided on May 30 that Fraser had paid a hitman to murder his wife.
They rejected Fraser's alibi – that he was on his delivery rounds that day – and his claim that his former friend, farmer Hector Dick, 56, of Mosstowie near Elgin was the real killer.
Fraser was jailed for life and cannot ask to be freed on parole for at least 17 years.
He was first convicted to murdering mum-of-two Arlene in January 2003 but continued to protest his innocence.
The Court of Criminal Appeal confirmed his conviction, but Fraser successfully went over the heads of Scottish judges and the UK Supreme Court ruled he had suffered a miscarriage of justice.
The successful appeal hinged on claims key evidence relating to the mystery reappearance of Arlene's rings in the bathroom of her Smith Street home, nine days after she vanished, had been kept from defence lawyers.
After the Supreme Court decision, which led to a political storm over the independence of the Scottish legal system, prosecutors demanded a new trial. A second jury reached the same conclusion as the first jury, nine years ago.
Both juries heard Fraser was seething with jealousy because he suspected his wife might have a lover. He was also worried divorce might mean Arlene walking away with a large chunk of his money.
Sentencing Fraser in May, Lord Bracadale told him: "You instigated in cold blood the premeditated murder of your wife and mother of your children, then aged 10 and five years.
"The murder and disposal of the body must have been carried out with ruthless efficiency for there is not a trace of Arlene Fraser from that day to this and her bereft family continue to live with no satisfactory knowledge of what happened to her remains."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article