A Highland landowner accused of "blatant vandalism" in a protected ancient Caledonian pine forest is under investigation by the Scottish Government's wildlife agency.
Michael Bruce, the owner of the 10,000-hectare Glen Tanar estate on Deeside, is to be visited by officials from Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) tomorrow after complaints that forestry operations damaged trees, killed plants and scarred the landscape.
The alleged damage was discovered by a mountaineer, Derek Pyper, from Aberdeen, during a cycle ride up Glen Tanar. He was shocked to see that wide tracks had been bulldozed into the woods.
"There was a large area of what had been attractive woodland reduced to deep mud – not a pretty sight," he said.
Glen Tanar contains some of Scotland's finest native woodlands, which are meant to be protected by law. The glen is covered by five conservation designations, and lies in the Cairngorms National Park.
Conservation biologist Dr Adam Watson has seen pictures of the damage and says heavy machinery has killed vegetation and left native trees vulnerable to rot by skinning their barks.
He described the damage as "scandalous".
"It's the worst I have seen in many woods over recent years, and particularly reprehensible because it is in a beautiful section of ancient pine wood. I regard it as land vandalism on a large scale."
Watson complained to SNH and demanded that action be taken to curb alleged "unlawful" activities in Glen Tanar.
SNH's Tayside and Grampian area manager, David Bale, said: "We've received a complaint about potential damage at Glen Tanar and will visit the site on Monday to investigate." The Forestry Commission is also understood to be looking into the matter.
Landowner Michael Bruce accepted that the forest was in "poor condition", but argued that "one of the wettest summers in decades" was partially to blame.
He said: "Glen Tanar Estate operates at all times within our agreed long-term forest plan, which was prepared after public consultation and consultation with SNH and the Forestry Commission."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article