ALEX Salmond has defended the NHS after Scotland's public spending watchdog warned cash constraints had placed the service on an "amber warning".
Scots Labour leader Johann Lamont challenged the First Minister on the Government's health record after Auditor General Caroline Gardner issued the warning in evidence to a Holyrood committee.
At First Ministers Questions, Ms Lamont claimed the NHS had cut more than 2000 nurses, was struggling with a £1 billion repairs backlog and faced a £200 million real-terms budget cut.
Ms Lamont also criticised the reductions in college budgets and accused the First Minister of delaying a further £3bn of cuts until after the independence referendum in 2014.
She said: "When will the First Minister face up to the reality and be straight with the people of Scotland?
"This is about understanding what is happening in the real world to ordinary people now. Will he come and join the rest of us in the real world?"
Mr Salmond said: "There are more people working in the National Health Service in Scotland than when the SNP took office. On every single judgment of output, on waiting lists, patient care, Scotland's National Health Service is performing in outstanding fashion."
The First Minister defended his Government's performance, saying a recent Audit Scotland report "pointed out that Scotland's health service is well managed in terms of its finances".
In a swipe at Labour's decision to review the affordability of Government giveaways, including free university tuition and free prescriptions, the First Minister added: "Johann Lamont is the fourth Labour leader I've faced across this chamber.
"If she pursues this line she will certainly not be the last Labour leader I face across this chamber."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article