ALISTAIR Darling has launched a withering attack on SNP plans to keep the pound and create a currency union with the UK if Scots vote for independence in 2014.
The former Chancellor, now head of the pro-UK Better Together campaign, warned there were no guarantees the Nationalists' scheme would be accepted and, if it was, would come with "massive strings attached".
In his most comprehensive critique of SNP policy to date, he also questioned its claims on EU membership and warned Scots could no longer claim British culture as their own if they left the UK, declaring: "British music will no longer be our music."
Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon have claimed that an independent Scotland would be welcomed into a currency union with the UK, with the Bank of England as its shared central bank and lender of last resort.
But Mr Darling said: "No one has asked the rest of the UK whether or not they would agree to this – it's simply asserted. Why should the rest of the UK agree to a currency union without being asked?
"But the most obvious problem with the common currency is that sooner or later it takes you to economic and then political union.
"Scotland would leave the UK only to end up in the same place as it began, with all the trauma that would entail."
Warning that Scotland would have to hand back economic levers to a foreign neighbour, he added: "It is a nonsense."
The criticisms were a direct riposte to Mr Salmond's speech to the SNP conference, in which the First Minister pledged to end the "nonsense" of Scotland belonging to the UK.
It came as Mr Darling delivered the John P Mackintosh lecture in East Lothian, given annually in memory of the former Labour MP and champion of devolution.
A spokeswoman for the pro-independence Yes Scotland campaign said: "It is a straightforward matter for Scotland to retain the pound after independence. It makes sense for Scotland to share a currency with our biggest trading partners and it also makes sense for the rest of the UK."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article