HOME Secretary Theresa May has vowed the Government will continue to fight to "get rid" of radical cleric and terror suspect Abu Qatada after he won his latest battle to stay in the UK.
Qatada, who has been fighting extradition for more than a decade, was due to be released from prison today after winning an appeal against deportation to Jordan to face trial.
The Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac) allowed his appeal and granted him bail, meaning Qatada will be released to return to his home address.
He will be subject to a 16-hour curfew and allowed out between 8am and 4pm, with the condition he wears an electronic tag, does not use the internet, and does not contact certain people.
Once described as Osama bin Laden's right-hand man in Europe, Qatada was convicted of terror charges in Jordan in his absence in 1999.
The country has given the Home Secretary assurances that no evidence gained through torture will be used against him. But in their ruling, Siac judges said they could not be sure this would be the case.
The Government now plans to appeal. Mrs May told the Commons she believed Mr Justice Mitting applied the "wrong legal test". She added: "The Government has been doing everything it can to get rid of Abu Qatada and we will continue to do so."
Qatada featured in hate sermons found on videos in the flat of one of the September 11 bombers. He has challenged and thwarted every attempt by the Government over the last decade to extradite him.
Three Siac judges, including Justice Mitting, ruled evidence from his former co-defendants Abu Hawsher and al Hamasher, said to have been obtained by torture, could be used against him in a retrial.
But Robin Tam, QC, for the Home Office, told the court it had ruled on a "possibility of a possibility".
Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper backed plans to appeal the "extremely serious and worrying judgment", but said Mrs May had to get Qatada's deportation back on track.
Qatada's solicitor Gareth Peirce said: "It is important to reaffirm this country's position that we abhor the use of torture and a case that was predicated upon evidence from witnesses who have been tortured is rejected – rejected by the courts of this country as by the European Court."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article