MINISTERS have been warned strike action by defence lawyers that will plunge the court system into chaos is "unavoidable" after SNP MSPs backed Government reforms of the legal aid system aimed at saving £4 million.
Legal groups and opposition parties were furious at a U-turn by Holyrood's Justice Committee. It had been strongly critical of the proposals, under which those accused of crimes who have disposable incomes of £68 a week or more make a financial contribution to their defence bill.
Solicitors will be asked to collect contributions from clients in summary – non-jury – cases instead of receiving the entire fee from the Scottish Legal Aid Board if the Government's bill is passed.
As 200 lawyers protested outside the Scottish Parliament, SNP committee members backed the bill in a crucial stage-two vote on the plans.
The Edinburgh Bar Association said the move made strike action certain. Its president, Cameron Tait, accused the committee of "changing direction in line with political instruction and not taking the morally correct course of sticking to its guns". Austin Lafferty, president of the Law Society of Scotland, said: "It's great that so many chose to voice their concerns today. However, it is regrettable that the compelling arguments they and the society presented were not supported by a majority of the Justice Committee.
"The Scottish Government's latest drive to reduce the legal aid budget cannot be seen in isolation from the savings already made over the last few years. This has included significant cuts to the fees paid to solicitors for acting on behalf of people who cannot themselves afford legal representation.
"The profession has always tried to work constructively with Government in its bid to save money but the suggested collection proposal is simply unfair."
The Government insisted the plans would save almost £4m annually and affect fewer than 20% of prisoners.
The current impasse prompted senior police to claim potential action by lawyers could halt their interviews with suspects and make the system grind to a halt.
Critics have warned the moves will turn lawyers into unpaid debt collectors and raised fears some cases will be derailed if the accused cannot pay.
Mr Tait said Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill's assurances meant little to the profession. He added: "We are disappointed that the party line seems to have been toed and we will clearly have to reflect on today's debate and decide where the profession goes from here.
"Strike action is clearly something the profession is considering and the outcome of today will certainly have a bearing on that.
"It's disappointing that the Justice Committee does, to an extent, seem to have changed direction in line with party instruction and has not taken the morally correct course of sticking to its guns."
Conservative MSP Margaret Mitchell moved a series of motions in line with Scottish Law Society objections to the proposals, saying the idea of making solicitors collect money "beggared belief".
Labour member Jenny Marra also tried and failed to persuade the committee to remove the contribution threshold from the text of the bill.
Mr MacAskill said: "I do not consider it unreasonable to expect a solicitor to collect his or her fee direct from the client who is being provided with legal assistance."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article