POLITICIANS have demanded greater clarity over AG Barr's plans for its workforce after the Irn-Bru maker agreed a £1.4 billion merger with rival Britvic in a move that will result in 500 jobs being axed across both businesses.
Barr Britvic Soft Drinks will have its registered and legal headquarters in Cumbernauld, North Lanarkshire, but its operational base will be in Hemel Hempstead, North London, where Britvic has been located since March.
Roger White, AG Barr's chief executive, who will run the combined company, said it was "rather simplistic" to say that the important decisions will be taken down south.
He said: "Who will work where, if you like, we haven't made any comments on yet because that is still subject to being fully reviewed."
Mr White has told investors he can strip £40 million of annual running costs from the new company with plans to axe between 8% and 12% of the workforce. Some 500 of the existing 4300 posts are likely to go.
If cuts fall proportionately, it would
see 120 roles go at AG Barr, which employs 980 people.
AG Barr has operations in Forfar in Angus and Pitcox in East Lothian, as well as bases in England and Wales. However, Mr White said no decisions had been made about where the cuts will land.
The uncertainty over jobs comes as unemployment rose in Scotland by 4000 between July and September but dropped across the UK as a whole. It is the second successive quarterly rise north of the Border.
Headline unemployment now stands at 218,000.
At Westminster, MPs demanded answers for the Cumbernauld workforce in light of the merger. Labour's Gregg McClymont, MP for Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch, who is seeking an urgent meeting with Mr White, said: "I'm seeking clarity from Britvic about whether the staff levels at the company HQ will increase or decrease as a result of the merger."
Margaret Curran, the Shadow Scottish Secretary, said: "AG Barr is one of the town's biggest employers and the workforce will want reassurance about the future."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article