England will discover after a second scan on Steven Finn's thigh injury today whether he is likely to play any part in their Test tour of India.
The fast bowler was yesterday ruled out of the second match of four, starting in Mumbai on Friday, but England remain optimistic that he may yet be back in the reckoning for the third and fourth Tests in Kolkata and Nagpur.
After the tourists' nine-wicket defeat in Ahmedabad, many were convinced that Finn was needed to try to start the fightback.
It is, therefore, discouraging that, after a recurrence of the thigh strain he suffered three weeks ago, England must continue in the short term at least to get by without him.
Finn's unavailability does solve one selection problem, though. England's critics have also prescribed a return at the Wankhede Stadium for Monty Panesar as a second spinner – a scenario which probably would have put vice-captain Stuart Broad's place under threat in a four-man attack.
That vexed equation no longer threatens, but Finn's absence is a blow none the less to England's chances of overturning historical trends by recovering from 1-0 down to win or even draw in India.
Andy Flower, the England coach, broke the news of Finn's setback. He said: "He has unfortunately hurt a leg again, a couple of days ago, and is having another scan tomorrow.
"We don't think he's got any structural damage, but it would be careless to suggest he might play in the second Test."
Panesar's return is pro-bable, but Flower is reserving judgment until he has seen the second-Test pitch.
The coach added: "Monty Panesar, of course, has a chance to play. We might well go with two spinners, but we'll judge that when we actually see the conditions."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article