A FORMER paratrooper had traces of his grandmother's blood on his boots and clothing after she was killed in the house they shared, a court heard.
Garry Kane, 41, who struggled with heroin addiction, denies murdering Kathleen Milward, 87, on January 3 this year.
The High Court at Dumbarton heard that traces of Mrs Milward's blood were found on Kane's boots, on the front and back of his jeans, and in small amounts inside the pockets.
Under questioning from advocate depute Jennifer Bain, the forensic scientist Dr Nighean Stevenson said Kane's DNA was also found on the pensioner's head, neck and hands as well as on a handbag and purse in her bedroom of the property in Stonehouse, South Lanarkshire.
Dr Stevenson, 40, said the blood on Kane's clothes could have been there as result of him assaulting his grandmother.
She said: "The scientific findings would support the assertion that blood from Kathleen Milward had been deposited by contact and by aerial transfer on the jeans and deposited by contact on the toe area of both Hi-Tech boots.
"If Garry Kane had worn these jeans during an assault on Kathleen Milward while she was bleeding, this could be an explanation for our findings."
However, Dr Stevenson added that she "could not rule out the possibility that it could have been transferred on to his jeans while attempts at resuscitation were carried out while she was bleeding".
Moreover, no traces of blood were apparently found on Kane's aunt, Maureen Kennedy, 58, who had administered CPR to Mrs Milward.
It is alleged Kane repeatedly punched and kicked Mrs Milward, struck her on the head and body with a blunt implement, placed his hand over her mouth, applied pressure to her neck, and murdered her.
The trial, before Lord Matthews, continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article