THE type of emergency services allowed to break the speed limit could be increased.
Currently police, fire and ambulance services as well as the Serious Organised Crime Agency in England are allowed to disregard speed limits in the course of their work.
However, a consultation launched by the Department for Transport could result in other services engaging in life-saving activities allowed the same exemption.
It would cover emergency services in Scotland.
The agencies that have expressed interest in being exempted include Ministry of Defence bomb disposal units, conveyance of human tissue for transplant, blood transfusion, mountain rescue, mine rescue, radiation emergencies, coastguard and lifeboat launching, the DfT said.
A number of fire-fighting vehicles not currently covered, such as those used by the Forestry Commission, could be included as a result of the consultation, due to close next February.
Additional training will be mandatory to ensure that drivers can operate safely when exceeding speed limits, though the consultation acknowledged that the risk of accidents would increase.
Road Safety Minister Stephen Hammond said: "Police, fire and ambulance service drivers are at times required to exceed the speed limit in order to save lives.
"It is only right we look at allowing other services whose duties can mean the difference between life and death to exceed the speed limit when responding to emergencies."
The consultation document, published yesterday, acknowledged that breaking speed limits was more risky. "It is inevitable that there will be additional risks even if the drivers of emergency vehicles are highly trained. However exceeding the speed limit, as opposed to the mere use of blue lights, is liable to be associated with the higher risks," it noted.
A spokeswoman for Transport Scotland said: "This is a reserved matter, and one on which we have had contact with DfT in the past. We will give due consideration to the document before making any substantive response."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article