A killer who has campaigned for years to be released from hospital and instead be sent to prison has finally had his wish granted.
The decision by appeal judges now opens the way for Alexander Reid, 62, to ask the parole board to free him – something he could not do while still a patient in the State Hospital, Carstairs.
Reid's victim, Angela McCabe, 26, was stabbed to death as her four-week-old baby daughter lay upstairs in her crib in her home in Bishopbriggs, East Dunbartonshire.
Reid was accused of murder. But in court his guilty plea to a reduced charge of culpable homicide was accepted.
Judge Lord Walker heard evidence from doctors and sent teenage Reid to the State Hospital "without limit of time".
But during his time in Carstairs, where he is thought to be the longest serving patient, doctors came to believe there had been a mistake.
Back in 1967 tests appeared to show Reid was suffering from a mental disorder which would today be classed as learning disability. The Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh heard psychiatrists now label Reid's problem as an untreatable dissocial personality disorder.
His legal team successfully argued the change in diagnosis amounted to new evidence allowing Reid to appeal.
Five appeal judges, instead of the usual three, yesterday quashed the 1967 decision to send Reid to Carstairs and substituted a life sentence.
Reid has completed the 10 year minimum the judges attached to the life sentence, opening the way for him to seek parole.
Lady Paton, giving the judges' ruling, said Reid's crime was "horrific and appalling".
She added: "Reid, then aged 17, brutally attacked and killed a young woman, then aged 26, who had earlier given him a cup of tea after he had sharpened gardening tools for her.
"The attack happened in her own home while her husband was at work and she had the care of their young child.
"It was a terrible and senseless crime, resulting in the loss of a young wife and mother and inflicting lasting grief and suffering on her bereaved family."
In 2007, Reid's legal team came to the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh to challenge Lord Walker's ruling of 40 years earlier – but lost. Backed by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, which investigates possible miscarriages of justice, Reid was given another chance.
Dr Natasha Billcliff, responsible for Reid's care in the State Hospital, told the appeal judges he was "disruptive", needed more time and attention than any other patient and spurned attempts at therapies. Nothing the hospital could do was likely to improve his condition. Other medics said if Reid was sentenced now he would probably not end up in hospital.
The appeal judges were told that while prisoners can be transferred to the State Hospital "administratively" there was no such mechanism for sending Carstairs patients to prison.
In 1985, Reid was sent, for a time, to a hospital in Montrose on the basis his problem was a personality disorder rather than illness. While on a day out he was arrested for attempting to abduct an eight-year-old child.
Reid, judged sane and fit to plead, served a three month prison sentence before being sent back to Carstairs.
Lord Johnston, one of the judges involved at an earlier stage, said it was a "supreme irony" that, for the first time in his career as a judge, a man was actually asking to go to prison.
Reid's long-running campaign has involved four applications to Lanark Sheriff Court and a challenge in the Court of Session to one sheriff's decision.
When that was rejected he went to appeal judges at the Court of Session. They ruled in his favour but the then Secretary of State successfully appealed to the House of Lords. Reid had also taken his case to the European Court of Human Rights.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article