HOLYROOD'S Presiding Officer has called for changes to a controversial rule which allows MSPs to correct the official record of parliamentary proceedings without alerting the public.
Members of Parliament's watchdog standards committee will consider tightening up the system at a meeting next week, following the intervention by Tricia Marwick.
The move follows a row over First Minister Alex Salmond correcting an error last month.
During clashes at First Ministers Questions in October he wrongly claimed Scotland's green energy industry supported 18,000 jobs. He amended the Official Report – Holyrood's equivalent of Hansard – to give the correct figure of 11,000.
But the correction only came to light later after it was spotted by an energy expert, prompting calls to make MSPs highlight any changes they make.
In a letter to the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, Ms Marwick asked members to "look again at the current process, in terms of transparency and general understanding".
She said there remained some confusion over the corrections system, which was agreed in 2010 and adopted last year. Her request followed talks with the powerful Parliamentary Bureau, the cross-party group which agrees Holyrood's day-to-day agenda.
A briefing note circulated to members of the standards committee ahead of its meeting next week says: "The issues raised have mainly been about how a correction is publicised rather than the fact that a corrections mechanism exists.
"The committee may therefore wish to consider what steps would be appropriate to publicise the existence of corrections and whether any elements of the current guidance need to be clarified or strengthened."
Under the present guidelines MSPs are encouraged to correct the record if they become aware of making straightforward factual errors. They are not obliged to contact other MSPs to flag up the correction.
The Official Report shows clearly where alterations have been made and they are noted on an obscure page on the Parliament's website. The standards committee is expected to consider whether they should be announced on the widely-read Business Bulletin, the daily digest of Parliamentary business.
Among those who have demanded a change to the rules is Liz Smith, the Scottish Conservative MSP whose question on green energy jobs elicited the incorrect answer from Mr Salmond.
In a letter to the Presiding Officer she wrote: "Clearly, if this is accepted practice then it effectively means that any member may correct the Official Report as they see fit without the openness and transparency which, I believe, are two of the founding principles of the Parliament itself."
The row over Mr Salmond's correction sparked furious demands from the SNP for other MSPs, including Labour leader Johann Lamont and Tory leader Ruth Davidson, to correct alleged errors of their own.
However, the MSPs insisted their statements were justifiable and they had no need to change the Official Report. All corrections are voluntary.
SNP MSP Dave Thompson, convener of the standards committee said: "The mechanism this committee put in place ensured there is a full audit trail behind any correction, so that you see the original Official Report and also how a member has sought to correct the record."
He added: "Our committee recognises this is an important issue. We will consider the Presiding Officer's request to revisit the mechanism at our next meeting."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article