The pace of progress in cutting global greenhouse gas emissions is recklessly slow, experts have warned.
On current projections, global emissions of CO2 will plateau at around 50 billion tonnes during the coming decades, putting the world on course for changes to the climate that are way beyond the experience of modern civilisation.
As ministers join negotiators from around the world for the UN climate talks in Doha, Qatar, environmental experts have warned that countries were acting as if change was too difficult and costly, while delay did not pose any problems.
The paper by Lord Nicholas Stern (who wrote a review into the economics of climate change in 2006) and colleagues at the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, said rigidity at the UN talks and the behaviour of negotiators was hampering progress, while vested interests remained powerful.
But they said accelerating the pace of changing to a low-carbon economy was both feasible and crucial.
They also warned that in order to keep global temperature rises to no more than 2ºC, considered to be the point beyond which the world would experience dangerous climate change, action to cut emissions was also needed from developing countries even if rich nations cut their greenhouse gas emissions to zero.
The experts warned there was a deep inequity in that poor countries would be worst hit by climate change while developed countries had benefited most from high-carbon growth.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article