A MAN who left a pensioner with serious knife injuries boasted how the attack would be "all over the news", a court has heard.
Derek Clark, 32, attacked grandmother Mary Coulter after he and two accomplices went to her home in search of her son Ronnie.
He was looking for Mr Coulter amid claims he had terrorised Clark's family.
Judge Lord Stewart, at the High Court in Glasgow yesterday, said photographs of Mrs Coulter's injuries "should come with a health warning" .
Clark was in court after admitting to the attempted murder of the 76-year-old.
Prosecutor Alex Prentice, QC, said Clark was high on cocaine as he left his home in Ashgill, South Lanarkshire before the attack in the early hours of March 22 this year.
He was joined by friends Richard Parvin, 29, and 27-year-old Darryl Finnie. All were wearing balaclavas and Clark was armed with a large knife. The court heard how Mrs Coulter was in bed at home in Overtown, North Lanarkshire, when she heard banging at her front door. She went downstairs and could see the trio looking into rooms in her house.
Mr Prentice said: "Clark – without provocation – hit her on the right said of her face just below the eyes. She immediately felt the impact, put her hands to her face and felt wet blood."
A neighbour heard Mrs Coulter shouting for help once the trio had left. The court heard that the men were in Finnie's mother's home in Carluke, South Lanarkshire later that morning. She asked why they were there and Clark told her: "You'll know soon enough – it will be all over the news."
Mrs Coulter required an emergency blood transfusion and facial reconstructive surgery. Her injuries included a 15cm wound across her face and a 10cm gash to her head resulting in a skull fracture.
Parvin and Finnie pled guilty to conspiring to inflict injury on Ronnie Coulter.
Clark's QC said he had gone looking for Ronnie Coulter that night and that he "bitterly regrets" what happened to the pensioner.
Ian Duguid, defending, added: "He maintains that he did not know he was striking Mrs Coulter."
Lord Stewart deferred sentencing until later this month.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article