THE new body set up to regulate crofting and root out absentee crofters has been accused of hypocrisy and impropriety after it emerged one of its elected commissioners is himself a long-time absentee.
The crofter at the centre of the row is Murdo MacLennan, a respected figure in the Western Isles who has been active in crofting for 30 years.
A former building society manager and chief executive of the Western Isles Health Board, he was appointed a commissioner on the old Crofters Commission and served for six years. He was then elected to the new body, the Crofting Commission, earlier this year.
He agreed crofters should live on their crofts or as near to them as possible, and defended his role as commissioner.
But at least six letters from crofters are understood to have been received by the new commission complaining that Mr MacLennan, who adjudicates on absenteeism, is an absentee, and questioning why he was allowed to stand for election.
The Crofting Commission took over from the Crofters Commission in April, with six of its nine commissioners directly elected for the first time.
One of its main aims is to promote croft occupancy and active use. It requires crofters to live within 20 miles of crofts or be deemed absentees.
The commission can impose a tenant on a croft owned or rented by an absentee. There are currently around 1700 absentees.
Last night, Mr MacLennan defended his role on the body. He said: "I live on my family's croft at Aignis in the Point area of Lewis. But I also inherited two other croft tenancies – one in Cliasmol on Harris in 1987 which is over 50 miles away, which takes me an hour from my home, and another on the uninhabited island of Scarp off Harris, in 2005.
"There are only four active crofters with crofts on Scarp and obviously none of us now stays on the island. But we work hard just to make sure there is still some crofting activity on the island."
He has approached the North Harris Trust, the community-led landowner, to see if there was demand locally to take over the tenancy at Cliasmol.
He said the old commission investigated his absenteeism in 2011, but he had letters of support proving he was an active crofter in the North Harris area, so the commission agreed to review the case in 2016.
He confirmed he was still involved with absentee cases. "The chairman of the old Crofters Commission took the view that I had been appointed to act as a commissioner on a regulatory body so should sit in on meetings concerning cases of absenteeism."
It was the same on the new body, he said: "When I stood for election to the new commission earlier this year, all my election literature made clear that I was crofting in both Lewis and Harris. So people knew very well that I lived in Lewis and expressed their support for me very clearly in the ballot box."
The commission's own minutes show the issue was raised at a meeting in July, by another commissioner, Colin Kennedy, who said a commissioner who was an absentee should not take part in decisions on occupancy, as it could cause a perception of impropriety.
Mr Kennedy, from Coll, declined to comment, but a spokeswoman for the Crofting Commission confirmed Mr MacLennan was deemed an absentee.
On whether he should have been allowed to stand, she said: "The commission is aware that there may be an ambiguity within the interpretation of the regulations and is looking into this for the future."
There are 12,000 crofters on 18,027 crofts. More than 300 absentee cases were resolved over the past two years following contact from the Crofting Commission. A total of 29 tenancies were terminated.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article