Egypt's president has scrapped a decree that gave him extra powers and ignited violent protests.
The retraction of President Mohamed Mursi's decree was announced after a national dialogue boycotted by almost all the president's opponents.
But opponents were still angry yesterday, saying he had deepened the conflict by pressing on with a vote on a constitution shaped by Islamists.
Mr Mursi and his Islamist group have insisted the referendum should go ahead on December 15 to seal a democratic transition that began 22 months ago with the ousting of Hosni Mubarak.
Prime Minister Hisham Kandil, a technocrat with Islamist leanings, said the referendum was the best test of opinion.
But opposition factions, uncertain of their ability to vote down the constitution against the Islamists' organisational muscle, want the document redrafted before any vote.
Ahmed Said, a liberal leader of the main opposition National Salvation Front, described the race to a referendum as an "act of war" against Egyptians.
Egypt tipped into turmoil after Mr Mursi grabbed powers to stop any court action to hinder the transition. An assembly led by Mr Mursi's Muslim Brotherhood then approved the constitution.
Liberals, leftists, Christians and others had already quit the assembly, saying their voices were ignored.
A leftist group led by defeated presidential candidate Hamdeen Sabahy demanded the referendum be deferred until a consensus was reached on a new draft, saying there could be "no dialogue while blood is being spilled in the streets".
But a Muslim Brotherhood spokesman said scrapping Mr Mursi's decree had removed any cause for controversy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article