THE European Union received the Nobel Peace Prize yesterday, honoured by the Norwegian com-mittee that recognised its decades of stability and democracy after the horrors of two world wars.
Fittingly for an institution with no single leader, the EU sent three of its presidents to the Oslo ceremony for the 2012 prize, which critics, including former Nobel laureate Desmond Tutu, say is undeserved.
"Sixty years of peace. It's the first time this has happened in the long history of Europe," said Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council, who collected the prize along with European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and Martin Schulz, president of the European Parliament. "The facts prove the European Union is a peacekeeping instrument of the first order."
Despite the warm words of unity and sense of common purpose, the EU and its major institutions were at odds after the announcement was made because they could not decide who should accept the award or who specifically was to be honoured.
In the end it was decided the prize was for all Euro-peans, to be picked up by the heads of the three main EU institutions. Twenty EU leaders also chose to attend the ceremony, but Prime Minister David Cameron, whose relationship with Brussels is tense, stayed away. And Mr Tutu, who fought the apartheid system in his native South Africa, said last week the EU did not deserve the award.
On Sunday members of left-wing and human-rights groups marched through Oslo in protest, saying the EU was not a rightful beneficiary under the terms Alfred Nobel laid down in his will in 1895.
"Alfred Nobel said the prize should be given to those who worked for dis-armament," said Elsa-Britt Enger, 70, from Grand-mothers for Peace.
"The EU doesn't do that. It is one of the biggest weapons producers in the world."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article