THE Conservative backlash against the UK Government's decision to press ahead with gay marriage, including in some places of worship, has begun in earnest despite reassurances that no church will be forced to hold same-sex ceremonies.
However, ministers were warned the proposal to make it illegal for the Church of England to hold gay weddings – which goes further than the Scottish Government's plans by singling out a particular denomination – was likely to be challenged in courts.
Maria Miller, the Equalities Minister, told MPs she was putting in place a "quadruple lock" to guarantee religious organisations would not have to marry homosexual couples against their wishes.
"I am absolutely clear that no religious organisation will ever be forced to conduct marriages for same-sex couples," she said.
Under the quadruple lock, it will also be unlawful for religious organisations or their ministers to marry same-sex couples unless their organisation's governing body has expressly opted in to provisions for doing so
The 2010 Equality Act will also be amended to ensure no discrimination claim can be brought against religious organisations or individual ministers for refusing to marry a same-sex couple.
But Tory Stewart Jackson branded the proposals a "constitutional outrage and a disgrace" and human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell denounced the plans as "a disappointing fudge", which could be open to legal challenge.
Elsewhere, there was some cheer for the Coalition when an Ipsos Mori poll for Freedom to Marry found three-quarters of voters supported gay weddings.
And last night Nick Clegg insisted that in years to come gay marriages would seem "very normal".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article