Western and Arab nations sympathetic to Syria's uprising against President Bashar al Assad have given full political recognition to the opposition, reflecting a hardening consensus the 20-month-old uprising might be nearing a tipping point.
Meeting in the Moroccan city of Marrakech as rebels battled Mr Assad's troops on the outskirts of Damascus, the Friends of Syria group called on the President to step aside and warned him against using chemical weapons.
At the same meeting, the leader of Syria's opposition coalition called on the Alawite minority to launch a campaign of civil dis-obedience against Mr Assad, an Alawite who faces a mainly Sunni Muslim uprising against his rule.
Hours earlier, President Barack Obama announced Washington would now recognise the coalition of opposition groups as Syria's legitimate representative, joining France, Britain, Turkey and Gulf states.
"Participants acknowledge the National Coalition as the legitimate representative of the Syrian people and the umbrella organisation under which the Syrian opposition are gathering," said a draft declaration of the Marrakech meeting. The gathering brought together many western and Arab nations opposed to Mr Assad, whose family has ruled Syria for 42 years but excludes Russia, China and Iran, which have backed the President or blocked efforts to tighten pressure on him.
"Bashar al Assad has lost legitimacy and should stand aside to allow a sustainable political transition," said the text.
Referring to Western intelligence reports suggesting Syria might use chemical and biological weapons, it said "this would draw a serious response from the international community".
Opposition coalition member Abdelbasset Sida said diplomatic recognition would not be enough. "We need military support. A transitional phase has started, and we need the means to defend the liberated parts of Syria."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article