Efforts to resolve Egypt's worsening political crisis suffered a blow after the army postponed "unity" talks the opposition had minutes earlier said they would attend.
Confirmation that the secular, liberal opposition coalition would join the meeting after boycotting reconciliation talks hosted last week by Islamist President Mohamed Mursi had raised hopes of an end to street protests and deadly violence.
The latest convulsion in Egypt's transition to democracy was brought on by a decree last month from Mr Mursi in which he awarded himself powers to ram through a new constitution.
The constitution, to be voted on in a national referendum, is a necessary prelude to parliamentary elections due next year.
Mr Mursi's move caused huge controversy, dividing the country and bringing thousands of pro and anti-government protesters onto the streets in the worst upheaval since the fall of Hosni Mubarak almost two years ago.
Seven people have died in unrest between the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood and the opposition, but the army has yet to use force to keep protesters away from the presidential palace.
The postponement of the talks came as Egyptians abroad began voting at embassies in the referendum on the new constitution fast-tracked by Mr Mursi.
Former Arab League chief Amr Moussa said the main opposition coalition will push for a "no" vote in the referendum rather than boycotting it.
Mr Moussa also said he would attend unity talks with Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mohamed ElBaradei, leftist Hamdeen Sabahy and Wafd party leader Mounir Fakhry Abdel Nour
Defence Minister Abdel Fattah al Sisi said the talks would not be political, adding: "We will sit together as Egyptians."
The army dominated Egypt throughout the post-colonial era, providing every president from its ranks until Mubarak was overthrown last year, and oppressing the Muslim Brotherhood.
After his election in June backed by the Brotherhood, Mr Mursi shunted aside generals who had held interim power and appointed a new high command.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article