A leading opposition figure warned of more blood on the streets when Egyptians vote on a new con-stitution championed by Islamist President Mohamed Mursi, amid a growing political crisis.
In the referendum – this Saturday and next – Egyptians must accept or reject a basic law that has to be in place before national elections can be held early next year, an event many hope can steer the Arab world's most populous nation out of its turmoil.
At least seven people have died and hundreds have been injured in violence that erupted three weeks ago after Mr Mursi awarded himself sweeping powers to push the charter through a drafting body dominated by Islamists and boycotted by the opposition.
Ahmed Said, a leading member of the opposition National Salvation Front, said pushing through the referendum could provoke more violence as rival voters go to the polls.
"I believe there will be blood and a lot of antagonism, so it is not right to hold a referendum," he said.
Said, who also heads the liberal Free Egyptians Party, described the vote as too much of a risk. Despite a push for a "no" vote from the opposition, the measure is widely expected to pass, given the well-organised Muslim Brotherhood's record of winning elections since the fall of Hosni Mubarak almost two years ago. Many Egyptians, tired of turmoil, may simply fall in line.
However, the divisive referendum risks damaging Mr Mursi's ability to forge a consensus on vital policies to save the economy. It may also fragment an opposition whose present unity may struggle to survive a decisive defeat at the ballot box.
The vote has proved hugely controversial, with supporters of the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood fighting in Cairo and other cities with members of the liberal, secular opposition.
The presidential palace, focus of mass street rallies, is ringed by tanks and huge concrete barricades.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article