WITH tensions in Ulster running high, a senior hardline Loyalist politician yesterday claimed the Union Flag will soon be flying over Belfast City Hall again as more than 1000 people took to the streets for a day of protest that brought traffic to a standstill.
Billy Hutchinson, leader of the Progressive Unionist Party which is linked to the UVF, said he believed the process that led to restrictions on the number of days the flag is flown was illegal and should be challenged.
Hutchinson said: "It may have been a democratic decision between people in the City Hall but I think that the process was flawed."
He was speaking after around 1000 people protested against the decision to remove the flag on certain days for the second Saturday in a row. The previous weekend, 2000 people demonstrated.
Hutchinson refused to be drawn on the specifics of action, but said a number of areas were being explored and hinted that there could be a development within days.
He said: "We believe there are a number of decisions that we can take because we believe that there was (sic) illegal actions taken. I am not going to make promises to anybody. What I am saying is that we are going to try to put the flag back."
There has been widespread disorder across Northern Ireland since Belfast councillors voted on December 3 to reduce the number of days it flies the Union Flag from 365 to 17.
The controversial vote followed a public consultation on flags.
Almost 30 police officers have been injured in the trouble and more than 40 people arrested.
Yesterday's protest passed off peacefully, but city traffic was gridlocked for about an hour.
Earlier, several hundred peace campaigners formed a human chain around Belfast City Hall in response to the recent violence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article