The departing artistic director of the National Theatre of Scotland (NTS) has spoken for the first time about what she has described as anti-English bullying, which caused her to question her position.
Vicky Featherstone, who was the first artistic director of the NTS and is leaving after eight years at the helm, said a period of criticism that focused on her Englishness led her to question whether she could do her job.
Ms Featherstone, who is to become artistic director at the Royal Court Theatre in London, said attacks on her programming – with some critics questioning the company's track record on staging older Scottish plays – began to mention her background prominently.
Read the full interview with Vicky Featherstone here
The cumulation of opinions expressed in articles, letters and comments led to the most difficult period of her highly successful tenure, she says.
In an interview with The Herald today, she says: "It became a thing, interestingly, because people didn't like my programming. And rather than articulating that, it was easier to say the reason my programming was wrong for Scotland was because I am English, and therefore I don't understand how to programme for Scotland."
She adds: "It really, really upset me, because, as with all kinds of bullying, you don't have a voice – so the hardest thing for me was that if people had criticised the programme, I could have defended it, but when people are criticising the programme because I am English, that is indefensible."
In a separate development, Alasdair Gray, the author and artist, has criticised "colonists" who come north of the Border for a short period to advance their careers. In an essay, Gray mostly criticises arts administrators but adds: "I think Scottish folk in other professions will know settlers and colonists with similar attitudes."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article