THE father of murdered student Amanda Duffy has backed new double jeopardy laws that he believes will help families who have been let down by the justice system in the past.
Joe Duffy spoke after the Crown Office made a landmark legal move to pave the way for a second prosecution of Angus Sinclair, who was acquitted of the notorious World's End murders of Helen Scott and Christine Eadie committed 35 years ago.
Mr Duffy said it was "fitting" the Edinburgh case was the first to progress under the new double jeopardy legislation, as Sinclair's acquittal had led to the legal reform in Scotland that does away with the ancient legal principle that an accused cannot be tried for the same crime twice.
The murder of his own daughter, a promising drama student, 20 years ago, is one of a handful of cases being re-examined by police and prosecutors in light of the new laws.
Francis Auld stood trial for the murder of Ms Duffy, who was found battered to death on wasteground in Hamilton, South Lanarkshire, but the jury returned a not-proven verdict.
Mr Duffy said: "It is fitting the one to go though first is Angus Sinclair, as it is very much the case that sparked the whole thing into life.
"Probably the most abused word in the English language is closure. Following a murder you never get closure. To be honest it is bad enough somebody's life has been taken in this way but to have no justice, for the family to see a person walk free, often on a technicality, it's as if they have been offended against twice – first the loss of a loved one and then the justice system letting them down.
"It gives me hope that justice will be realised, not just for us but for the other families."
In 1995 Ms Duffy's parents won a civil action against Mr Auld and were awarded £50,000. Now 40, he lives in Sussex but has been re-interviewed by police in recent months.
Mr Duffy, who along with his wife Kate set up the support group Petal for those affected by murder and suicide following their daughter's death, added: "My hope is that double jeopardy is implemented properly. If you look at it from the perpetrators' point of view, they have the appeal process to go through.
"I know of one crime that was committed seven years ago and there have been 34 appeal hearings. It's absolutely ridiculous in terms of the cost and time."
At the time of her death, Ms Duffy was an aspiring actress and student at Motherwell College. She had been called to audition at the then Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama and was returning from a night out celebrating with friends when she was attacked.
She had been so badly beaten pathologists were unable to determine whether she had been injured by a weapon or with bare fists. She had had twigs thrust into her mouth and nose during the attack.
The Double Jeopardy (Scotland) Act 2011 set out five new conditions where an accused could be retried for a crime of which they were previously acquitted, including instances where "compelling new evidence" emerges.
A second prosecution can also be launched if evidence later emerges that an acquitted person has admitted to committing the offence, or where the original acquittal was "tainted" possibly by witness or juror intimidation.
Police are also re-investigating the murder of Indian waiter Surjit Chhokar in Overtown, Lanarkshire, in 1998.
A prosecution for the crime ended with the acquittal of three accused: Ronnie Coulter, Andrew Coulter and David Montgomery.
It is fitting the one to go though first is Angus Sinclair, as it is very much the case that sparked the whole thing into life
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article