THE SNP last night demanded Labour leader Johann Lamont apologise for her party's apparent U-turn on student tuition fees.
Going into the 2011 Holyrood election, Lamont, then deputy Labour leader, made a manifesto promise of "no upfront or back-end tuition fees for Scottish students" if elected.
She and other Labour candidates also signed up to the National Union of Students Scotland "Reclaim Your Voice" campaign against the fees.
But since becoming leader a year ago, Lamont has questioned provision of universal benefits such as tuition fees and free personal care.
Criticising the "something-for-nothing" culture in September, she asked: "What is progressive about judges and lawyers earning more than £100,000 a year not paying tuition fees for their child to follow in their footsteps at university, while one in four unemployed young people in Scotland can't get a job or a place at college?"
Last week Lamont went further, saying a return to the graduate endowment, effectively a fee paid after graduation, was "the most obvious option". Labour's manifesto pledge – like all such pledges – only applied to a single parliament, but the SNP accused Lamont of betraying students and likened her to Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg.
Clegg's infamous pledge not to raise tuition fees south of the Border has haunted his party after he backed trebling fees to £9000 a year as part of the Coalition deal.
SNP MSP George Adam, a member of Holyrood's education committee, said: "Like Nick Clegg, Johann Lamont and her party promised students that they would oppose tuition fees – and like Nick Clegg she and her party have, in short, order simply ignored their previous commitment and abandoned Scotland's students.
"Nick Clegg eventually had to apologise for betraying students in the way that he did. Johann Lamont should now follow his lead and do the same."
Labour MSP Hugh Henry said: "Alex Salmond and the SNP should be the ones apologising to the thousands of young Scots who cannot get a college place, or the fact that our top universities are failing to attract enough young Scots from disadvantaged backgrounds."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article