The Treasury would save more than £2 billion a year if workers were paid the "living wage" because of higher income tax payments and lower spending on benefits, a study shows.
The Resolution Foundation and IPPR think-tanks said the suggested rate of £7.45 an hour and £8.55 in London would add £6.5bn to workers' earnings.
Paying the living wage in the public sector would increase costs, but would save the Treasury more than £2bn, the study found.
The think-tanks said Whitehall departments and London boroughs should pay the living wage, which is higher than the £6.19 adult national minimum wage. About five million people earn less than the living wage.
Kayte Lawton, of the IPPR, said: "As a first step, making sure that all council staff in London are paid at least the living wage wouldn't cost very much but would be an important symbol of political leadership. Councils in other parts of the country, like Glasgow and Newcastle, have shown that the living wage can be affordable even though the costs are higher."
TUC general secretary designate Frances O'Grady said: "This report shows that fairer wages and decent in-work benefits are both vital means to boost living standards for millions of workers in low-pay Britain.
"Becoming a living wage employer helps staff, improves a company's reputation, and in many sectors is easily affordable. In some cases introducing the living wage leads to overall wage bills rising by less than 1%."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article