AN optician who was disqualified from practising with the NHS after defrauding the service of almost £30,000 has failed in his bid to reverse the decision.
Brian Kelly pocketed an extra £6000 a year over four years by making a substantial number of false and inaccurate claims for payment.
Mr Kelly issued customers with spare pairs of glasses and claimed money for them from the NHS at a later date, pretending they were legitimate repairs or replacements.
He carried out the fraud – totalling £29,398.30 – at his firm, Kelly Opticians, in Shetland, between April 1995 and December 1999.
In 2007, an NHS tribunal took the decision to disqualify him from inclusion in its list of opticians, despite the fact the fraud "only" extended to £6000 per year out of a turnover of £400,000 and he had repaid more than £12,000.
Mr Kelly appealed against the decision in the Court of Session, but Judge Lord Carloway ruled in favour of the health service.
He said: "The nature of the appellant's activities was that he operated a system within his firm whereby spare pairs of glasses were provided, especially to children, and claimed for by post-dated forms which described the spare pairs as legitimate repairs or replacements."
Lord Carloway said: "The court is unable to classify the tribunal's disposal as excessive.
"The tribunal, as a specialist body, is uniquely placed to determine the issue of disposal in the case of a significant fraud by someone in the appellant's former position. Disqualification for such a fraud cannot be viewed as in any way unreasonable. The appeal is accordingly refused."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article