Campaigners claim Scottish Natural Heritage's record as a conservation manager in the islands means it should be ignored by ministers deciding whether to designate an area of sea for protection.
SNH is recommending that ministers designate the South of Barra as a special area of conservation (SAC) to protect harbour seals, sandbanks and reef habitat. But many islanders fear it would restrict local boats' fishing activity. And they have not been placated by SNH saying fishing could continue on a managed basis.
Scotland's Environment Minister, Paul Wheelhouse, ordered an independent review of SNH's scientific advice on the proposal. This has been completed and a decision is expected shortly.
But the Southern Hebrides Against Marine Environmental Designations (Shamed) group argues that any review of SNH science for Sound of Barra SAC must reject the proposal.
Fisherman Angus MacLeod, who has co-ordinated opposition to SNH proposals said: "The isle of Rum has been set aside for state-managed conservation since 1958. This huge island has been used as a private outdoor laboratory for 50 years, particularly to study its red deer, but I have yet to hear this work is valued by working deer managers in Scotland. In fact, it is quite the reverse.
"Rum had also shown SNH had a lot to learn from others about sustaining human communities."
But SNH spokesman said Mr MacLeod's view of Rum was outdated "Community development is well underway on the island. We transferred ownership of the village, including land for crofts, to the community in 2010."
He added: "We are confident that the scientific case for the Sound of Barra SAC is robust. "
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article