A fall in the number of tourists visiting Scotland last summer has been blamed on the "Olympic effect".
Many holidaymakers to Britain decided to stay London and soak up the atmosphere surrounding the world's biggest sporting spectacle causing Scotland to lose out.
Latest official figures show travellers spent 114,000 fewer nights in the Scotland between July and September last year compared to the same period in 2011 – a drop of 12%.
Overseas visitors also spent £53 million less in the summer of 2012 than the previous year.
Both figures were considerably worse than other parts of the UK, suggesting Scotland was particularly hard hit by the Games, as well as dire weather and a sluggish economy.
Scotland's national tourism agency said it was disappointed, but said the wider picture was positive.
Mike Cantlay, chairman of VisitScotland, said: "Times have been undeniably tough for businesses over the summer, particularly in certain sectors such as outdoor attractions and activities.
"We all know the summer was a total washout except in the north-west, with many event cancellations, and that the Olympics impacted on domestic visits outside of London.
"This is such a shame because the first part of the year was a huge success despite the economic gloom – evidenced by a 3% increase in spend in the past 12 months, and a tourism industry that was geared up for making the summer a success."
The Office of National Statistics released a tranche of tourism data yesterday, which included some good news for Scotland.
Spending from oversees travellers for the year to September 2012 is up 12% when compared to the previous year, while the number of foreign visitors also increased.
But the healthy longer-term outlook failed to hide a dismal summer for Scottish tourism.
London experienced a £370m boost from foreign spending last summer compared to 2011 as tourists bought Olympics and Paralympics tickets.
Scotland, on the other hand, saw a £53m decrease on 2011. England was up £490m and Wales up by £1m.
Similarly, it was Scotland that was worst hit by the drop in visitors in 2012. Last summer, tourists spent 12% fewer nights north of the Border than in 2011, compared with a 5% drop in London, a 3% drop in England and a 9% rise in Wales.
Professor John Lennon, director of the Moffat Centre for Travel and Tourism Business Development, said: "London is a gateway to the UK. An awful lot of Scottish tourism will come in through London particularly the international stuff."
He suggested the spin-offs from films located in Scotland such as the animation Brave and James Bond blockbuster Skyfall could see visitors return.
Willie MacLeod, executive director of the Scotland branch of the British Hospitality Association, agreed the Olympics "kept people away from Scotland" but predicted a healthy surge in tourism at the end of 2012.
Tourism Minister Fergus Ewing said: "There is no denying conditions were tough this summer."
However, the Royal Yacht Britannia berthed at the Ocean Terminal in Leith, Edinburgh, bucked the trend with its strongest performance in a decade, with 123,111 visitors – a rise of 5%.
And Scotland's two national parks are to receive £2.9m for projects marking the start of a year-long initiative celebrating the great outdoors.
Cairngorms National Park, which attracts 1.4 million visits each year and contributes £115m to the local economy, has received an additional £2.31 million. Loch Lomond and Trossachs, which has four million visitors giving back £154m to local commerce, has received £580,000. Both sums are earmarked for projects that will bring significant economic, environmental and tourism benefits.
It coincides with the The Year of Natural Scotland scheme, led by VisitScotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article