MEMBERS of the UK Parliament have been accused of "living in cloud cuckoo land" after they said they deserved a 32% pay rise from £65,738 to £86,250 – in the week they capped benefit rises to just 1%.
The survey of 100 MPs was conducted by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), the pay watchdog, with the politicians expressing their views anonymously. It also found more than one-third felt they should keep generous final salary pensions.
Conservatives wanted the biggest pay rise. They, on average, said their salary should be £96,740.
The Liberal Democrats thought the right amount was £78,361, while Labour opted for £77,322.
One MP suggested he and his colleagues should be paid £40,000 or less.
Some 5% said £60,000 to £65,000 was fair and 17% went for £65,000 to £70,000.
Just under 70% thought they were underpaid on the current salary of £65,738 with the average pay suggested being £86,250.
At present, the average wage in the UK is £23,000. Public sector workers have had pay frozen for two years and will see a pay rise cap of 1% for the next two.
Dave Prentis, Unison general secretary, said: "At a time when millions of workers are getting zero pay rises, the idea that MPs believe they deserve a 32% increase is living in cloud cuckoo land.
"MPs should get real about pay, this shows they are totally out of touch with working people. How can they think they deserve a 32% increase when the rest of the country is being told to tighten their belts?"
He added: "No wonder this research is anonymous; it shows real contempt for the plight of families across the country struggling to make ends meet."
Asked what David Cameron thought of the MPs' demand for more pay, the Prime Minister's spokesman said: "His view is that MPs' pay is a matter for Ipsa. The I in Ipsa stands for independent."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article