Scotland should take greater control of its fisheries policy rather than allow the EU to continue to impose regulations by "remote control", according to the Fisheries Secretary.
Richard Lochhead wants "radical changes" to the Common Fisheries Policy to give more control to local and regional communities.
He said Scotland has suffered years of "painful cuts and baffling rules imposed by the EU", including quota reductions which he blamed on irresponsible fishing by Iceland and the Faroe Islands.
He has also called for Scottish seafood to be sold at a premium, similar to Scotch beef and lamb, to reflect its "delicious and high-quality" status.
Reflecting on the challenges facing the Scottish fishing industry in 2013, Mr Lochhead said: "After years of painful cuts and baffling rules imposed by the EU, some progress was achieved last month at the Fisheries Council in Brussels meaning there is a chink of light for Scottish fishing.
"The key is to keep up the momentum for change as we prepare for more crucial decisions in 2013."
He said more can be done to "capture the value of fish landed on our shores".
"Scottish seafood is delicious and high quality, yet that is not always reflected in the price achieved for our fish and shellfish," he said.
"I believe we can secure a premium for Scottish seafood, much in the same way as is achieved for Scotch beef or Scotch lamb.
"The Scottish Government is committed to working with the industry in 2013 to help achieve that."
Mr Lochhead's immediate priority this month is to reach a positive outcome in the EU-Norway talks, including the cod and mackerel quotas.
"The excessive fishing of the mackerel stock by the Faroes and Iceland means a quota cut is expected for that fishery," he said.
"However, I will not accept a double whammy for our pelagic sector, and will therefore reject European Commission's proposals for an even greater quota reduction that only rewards Iceland and Faroes for irresponsible behaviour.
"We need the EU to confirm the long overdue sanctions and take action if Iceland and the Faroes continue to overfish."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article