UN human rights chief Navi Pillay has called for an international investigation into what she said were decades of violations in North Korea, including torture and executions of political prisoners.
She voiced regret there had been no improvement since Kim Jong-un took power a year ago, and said it was time for the international community to help bring change for North Korea's "beleaguered, subjugated population".
She said: "An in-depth inquiry into one of the worst – but least understood and reported – human rights situations in the world is not only fully justified, but long overdue."
Japan is considering whether to submit a resolution on North Korea to the UN Human Rights Council (UNHCR), diplomats said.
UNHCR special investigators have been denied entry into North Korea for years. However, the council has the power to launch wider independent international inquiries which can build a criminal case.
Ms Pillay regretted that concerns about North Korea's nuclear programme and rocket launches were overshadowing "the deplorable human rights situation in the DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] which in one way or another affects almost the entire population and has no parallel anywhere else in the world".
Former New Mexico state governor Bill Richardson and Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt failed to secure the release of a Korean-American held in North Korea during a trip to the state last week.
The reclusive country's network of political prison camps is believed to contain 200,000 people or more and have been the scene of widespread violations including rapes, torture, executions and slave labour, according to Ms Pillay, a former judge at the International Criminal Court.
Living conditions in the camps are atrocious with insufficient food, little or no medical care and poor clothing, and the threat of death penalty for minor crimes, she added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article