CHRISTOPHER KANE'S deal puts him right up in the fashion big league alongside industry heavyweights Stella McCartney, Sarah Burton and Hedi Slimane.
PPR is very selective about who it brings into its luxury goods stable and hasn't backed a British brand since 2001.
Kane has been a fashion industry darling ever since his Central Saint Martins MA graduate collection consisting of neon bandage dresses gained plaudits in early 2006.
In addition to the prospect of his own store, Kane will be able to focus on expanding sales in Asia, as well as developing a lucrative leather goods and accessories line.
Kane, whose spring/summer 2013 collection features T-shirts printed with images of Boris Karloff as Frankenstein's monster and organza dresses decorated with black gaffer tape, is one of the most important designers at London Fashion Week.
He has a great skill for setting new trends and turns offbeat inspiration from things such as childhood pencil cases, dinosaurs and sea creatures into must-have pieces and sell-out collections.
Only time will tell whether allowing PPR to buy a majority stake will turn out well for him.
The Stella McCartney and Alexander McQueen brands flourished since being brought into the PPR stable in 2001.
However, designer Jil Sander ended up walking away from her eponymous brand in 2004 after Prada bought a majority share. She later returned as creative director.
Designers Roland Mouret and Helmut Lang also suffered problems after selling majority stakes to investors, with both leaving the companies. Mouret later bought back the rights to his brand and name.
Kane should look to McCartney for inspiration following her successful Olympic designs for TeamGB and her British Fashion Award for Designer of the Year.
Kane will need to turn his attention to shoes and handbags if he wants to become a true fashion great as brands make most of their money from accessories, rather than clothing collections.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article