A POLISH court has rejected a motion calling for the removal of a crucifix from Parliament's debating chamber in a case pitting Poland's traditional Catholicism against a younger generation who think the church is too strong.
Warsaw's district court argued that, since the cross had not been met with any objections in the past, it was accepted by most Poles and did not violate their rights.
It was placed in the chamber by two conservative politicians in 1997.
The court also chastised the Palikot's Movement party, led by former vodka tycoon Janusz Palikot, which brought the case, accusing it of calling for tolerance yet failing to show acceptance of religious symbols.
The party has tapped Poland's growing secularisation to become the country's third-largest political force. It said it would appeal the decision.
"The court failed to show objectivity," said Andrzej Rozenek, one of the party's parliamentary deputies."We are determined, so the path should take us all the way to Strasbourg," he said, referring to the European Court of Human Rights.
Rightist politicians said the decision reflected the feelings of most Poles. "This case was a grotesque joke," said Andrzej Jaworski, a deputy of the opposition Law and Justice Party and head of the party's committee to fight atheism.
Palikot's party includes Poland's first trans-sexual deputy and its only openly gay one and its agenda includes the legalisation of marijuana and same-sex partnerships. It claims the cross violates the Polish constitution and influences parliamentary decisions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article