The yawning gulf between China's rich and poor has been officially revealed as the government said it needed to narrow the politically explosive gap.
Beijing failed to report the widely-used Gini coefficient for income distribution for 12 years as complaints grew about the widening income gap during China's fastest growth on record.
It prompted suggestions the ruling Communist Party might be trying to downplay the gap between an elite who benefited from more than three decades of reform and the poor majority.
The Gini coefficient measures countries from zero to one, zero meaning there is perfect equality, and one equalling maximum inequality.
China's Gini coefficient was 0.474 last year on a 0-to-1 scale, down from a high of 0.491 in 2008, said the director of the National Bureau of Statistics, Ma Jiantang.
That would make China among the world's most unequal societies.
By comparison, Mr Ma said Brazil's Gini number was 0.55, Argentina's 0.46 and Russia's 0.40.
Mr Ma said: "On the one hand, we need to make the cake bigger, while on the other we need to do a better job of sharing it."
Narrowing the gap is a pressing issue for the new Communist Party leaders who took power in October.
China's boom has made multibillion-dollar fortunes for some entrepreneurs, but income growth for the majority has been sluggish.
Complaints about the lavish lifestyles of officials, Communist Party figures and military officers who drive luxury cars, own villas and send their children to elite foreign universities have fuelled tensions.
The government last issued a Gini number for 2000. Since then, Mr Ma's agency has said it knew too little about incomes of wealthy households to do a calculation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article