OFFICIALS in charge of Edinburgh's troubled flood prevention project are coming under further pressure amid delays and swelling costs.
The city council had promised a definitive figure on the cost of the scheme this month, but there will be no public update on the controversial scheme until the end of March as fears rise over the final bill and officials remain in deadlock with the contractors.
The internal mediation between the authority and civil engineering contractors Lagan Construction over the spiralling cost of the Water of Leith Flood Prevention Scheme comes after the bill nearly doubled in a year.
Edinburgh City Council said the setbacks and rising costs were due to bad weather and unforeseen land conditions.
Environment leader Lesley Hinds pledged the scheme would be complete by autumn 2013, but there are concerns it could now run into 2014 as deadlines continue to be missed, and the prospect of further hindrance caused by poor weather looms.
Council officers are challenging the bill, which council papers confirm stands at £21 million including fees for consultants yet to be publicly identified.
It is up from £11.5m originally budgeted, and the project is now more than a year late.
A raft of compensation claims have been lodged with the council by residents living in Stockbridge and Bonnington, who have suffered damage to their property by the massive civil engineering project.
Some who have had damage to their property are on the first floor and have never been troubled by flooding.
The council has been criticised for allowing open-ended contracts after the city's trams project – for which costs rose from £545m to £776m – was halted for months while officials and contractors tussled.
The scheme was initiated after about 500 properties suffered flooding from the Water of Leith in 2000, costing an estimated £25m of damage, but some believe the project on its current scale was not necessary.
One resident said the works, including pile-driving, "sent shockwaves through adjacent flats which literally shook them to their foundations".
Nigel Bagshaw, Green councillor for the area, said: "I am concerned about the time and cost slippage involved, and the lack of up-to-date information that has been made available. The residents along the Water of Leith in Stockbridge and Canonmills have a right to know when the works will be completed and their lives can get back to normal, and the people of Edinburgh more broadly are entitled to know when the dispute is likely to be resolved and what the final cost will be.
"The last thing we want is another tram-like fiasco with work stalled by poorly managed negotiations and increased expense for the Council.
"As I have said before, the city needs to look again carefully at the type of contracts it signs in order to protect itself against any unreasonable claims."
A council spokesman said: "As mediation is still ongoing between the council and the contractor, a report will not come before the committee until March 19 to allow that process to reach completion, although elected members will be getting a briefing on where things are at with the Flood Prevention Scheme in February".
A Lagan Construction spokesman declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article