French and Malian armoured columns rolled into the central Mali town of Diabaly after al Qaeda-linked rebels, who seized it a week ago, melted into the bush to avoid air strikes.
Diabaly, 220 miles north of Mali's capital, Bamako, had harboured the main cluster of insurgents south of the frontline towns of Mopti and Sevare.
Residents said some of the rebels had abandoned their flowing robes to blend in with the local population.
The charred and twisted wreckage of their pick-up trucks littered the sandy streets between mud-brick buildings.
"French and Malian forces have advanced to Diabaly and they will continue their mission of securing the town," said the deputy commander of Malian forces in nearby Niono, who gave his name only as Captain Samasa.
The French commander in the region warned of the risk of mines and booby traps in the insurgents' wake. The region around Diabaly has long been a hub for al Qaeda-linked cells believed to have camps in the Ouagadou forest near Mauritania's border.
France has deployed 2000 ground troops and its war planes have pounded rebel columns and bases in Mali. Its intervention turned back a column of Islamist rebels heading towards Bamako that threatened to topple Mali's government.
France now aims, with international support, to dislodge the Islamists from Mali's vast desert area before they use it to launch attacks on the West.
The Islamist alliance, grouping al Qaeda's North Africa wing AQIM and the home-grown Malian militant groups Ansar Dine and Mujwa, has imposed harsh sharia law in northern Mali, including amputations and the destruction of ancient shrines sacred to moderate Sufi Muslims.
A resident of Timbuktu said scores of pick-up trucks carrying Islamist fighters had arrived there since Saturday, as the rebels pull their forces towards their desert strongholds.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article