A BRITISH woman has been sentenced to death in Indonesia for drug trafficking.
Lindsay Sandiford, 56, originally from Redcar on Teesside, was arrested at Bali's airport last May after 10.6lb (4.8kg) of cocaine worth £1.6 million was found in the lining of her suitcase.
She claimed she was forced into taking the drugs into the country by gangsters who were threatening to hurt one of her children.
The death sentence prompted gasps of surprise in Denpasar District Court.
Sandiford, whose lawyers are expected to appeal the sentence, wept in court and covered her face as she was taken back to prison.
Prosecutors had recommended a 15-year jail term, but the judges said there were no mitigating circumstances and "no reason to lighten her sentence".
They said Sandiford had damaged the image of Bali as a tourism destination and weakened the government's anti-drugs programme.
Sandiford previously said she became involved because "the lives of my children were in danger".
Three other Britons were arrested at the same time as Sandiford in a sting operation. Julian Ponder and Rachel Dougall were accused of being involved in the same smuggling operation. Paul Beales was also detained.
At the time of her arrest, Dougall insisted she was the victim of a fit-up and Ponder claimed he was trapped.
A verdict is expected in the trial of Ponder, who is accused of receiving the drugs in Bali, tomorrow.
Five foreigners have been executed in Indonesia since 1998, all for drug crimes, although there have been no executions in the country since 2008, according to Australia's Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Foreign Office Minister Hugo Swire told the Commons: "We strongly object to the death penalty and continue to provide consular assistance to Lindsay and her family during this difficult time."
Mr Swire said repeated representations had been made to the Indonesian authorities and Foreign Secretary William Hague had raised the case with his counterpart in the country.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article