The different ways police deal with custody presents "challenges" for the new national force, a report has concluded.
The eight regional forces, which are being merged from April 1, have different approaches to risk management, staffing and healthcare, according to a report by HM Inspectorate of Constabulary for Scotland.
The way custody suites are designed and managed also differs.
In one location, there was no female officer despite there being female prisoners.
One force had no dedicated custody sergeant and the ratio of staff to prisoners "varied widely" across the country.
Aberdeen was singled out for having a "high-risk" approach. The lack of call buttons in cells mean staff make checks every half- hour.
Money has been approved to deliver a new custody facility in the city but the report recommended an interim solution should be found.
About 170 detainees were seen during a series of unannounced weekend inspections in each of the force areas.
The HM Inspector of Constabulary in Scotland, Andrew Laing, said: "What this inspection shows us is people detained in police custody in Scotland are treated with dignity and respect by professional staff, and they have their care and welfare needs met.
"Against this positive picture there are a number of differences in approach between the current eight forces which will present the new single service with some challenges along with significant opportunities for standardisation, and the benefit that brings.
"That will include standardising the approach to risk management, staffing models, training and the provision of healthcare, and computer-based custody management systems."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article